Windows Mobile Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, 8 July 2012

What cache mechanism to use from Windows Azure

Posted on 12:12 by Unknown
Yesterday, I had a talk with one college about cache mechanism. The true is that Microsoft has a lot of cache mechanism and when we talk about Windows Azure we have so different mechanism that there are times when we don’t know what the best cache mechanism for us is.
We will talk about 3 times of cache mechanism that are supported by Windows Azure:
  • Windows Azure Appfabric Cache (specials service defined by Windows Azure)
  • Co-located Role Caching (in-memory cache – resources are shared between cache and hosted applications)
  • Cache Worker role (dedicate role used only for cache)
From my perspective we have a lot of options. What we should know from the begging about Windows Azure Appfabric Cache is that be used in combination with Windows Azure of course, but from what I saw until now we cannot have a combination between co-located role caching and Windows Appfabric Azure Cache or Cache Worker role and Windows AzureAppfabric Cache.
Why we cannot combine them? Because the last two cache mechanism offed by Windows Azure can be accessed only from the deployments roles (NOTE: A deployment can have 1...n number of applications and roles). Because of this we cannot make this type of combination.
Windows Azure Appfabric Cache is a good solution when we need a cache mechanism that needs to be shared between different servers. It is not mandatory all servers to be hosted by Windows Azure. Using this cache mechanism we will be able to use our cache from any machine in the world that has internet connection. Don’t forget about an important think about this cache mechanism. Any machine that has the credentials of our cache can access it.
The other to cache mechanisms is very powerful mechanism that can be used by our application. When we need a cache mechanism for our application to be used only by our application I think that this caches are the best. What do decide to use? Co-location caching or cache worker role. The decision is not very simple. The good part is that the switching between them is very simple. Using the configuration file of our application we can very easy change the cache mechanism. Only when we make a switch between this and Windows AzureAppfabric Cache, in some case we will need to add some assemblies, but the API are very similar.
If we have a simple application, that doesn’t consume many resources; we can start with Co-located role caching. If the size of cache increase or/and resources that are used by our application increase also we could switch to Cache worker role. When we use the Cache worker role, we will have a dedicated role used only for cache. For a medium or big application this could be a better solution. Our resources of the roles will not be shared with the cache and also we will know that we will have a dedicated role only for cache.
But if we will have only a Cache worker role what will happen if the role crash. We will lose all data from cache. An option is to activate the automatic backup that will be made on our storage account. In this way the cache will be back-up automatically and restore when is needed. But until the role is restored we will have a period of time when the cache will be down. Also the cache data that is restored could not be with the last cache data (not all data from cache is backup in real time).
From what we saw, if we begin to use Cache worker role, a good decisions it would be to use two instances of Cache worker role if we want to be sure that we have a good uptime. But from my experiences, it is not very often that a role crash because of Microsoft. I n the case we have applications that dependents of crash and need to be up 100% of time use two instances of Cache worker roles of co-located cache.
If you have some data that need to be used only by one role from the application (for example some client information) than Co-located role cache could be a better solution. The time necessary to access this cache is the lowest one because the data are in the memory of the role (in general). Because you can define more caches (by name) in the same Co-located role you can group the data from that need to be stored in the cache.
It is not very simple to decide what cache mechanism to use from Windows Azure. If we need a cache mechanism that is used by different application, Windows Azure Cache can be a good decision, but is hard to decide to decide what to use between Co-located role cache and Cache worker role. For medium to big application I recommend Cache worker role. At start is okay to use Co-located role but after make a switch to Cache worker role. If you have application that doesn’t use all the resources of your role that Co-located role could help you to save some money. Don’t forget that the switch between these cache mechanisms is very easy. Almost all can be done from the configuration file.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Azure AppFabric Cache, cache, Windows Azure | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Service Bus Topic - Automatic forward messages from a subscription to a topic
    Windows Azure Service Bus Topic is a service that enables us to distribute the same messages to different consumers without having to know e...
  • CDN is not the only solution to improve the page speed - Reverse Caching Proxy
    I heard more and more often think like this: “If your website is to slow, you should use a CDN.” Great, CDN is THE solution for any kind of ...
  • Content Types - Level 6: Rich Media
    Level 6: Rich Media NOTE: This is part 7 of 7 and the conclusion of this continuing series; please see earlier posts for more background inf...
  • Publishing our CellCast Widget for iPad
    The rush has been on this week as our development team worked to design a new version of our CellCast Widget specifically for Apple's up...
  • Patterns in Windows Azure Service Bus - Message Splitter Pattern
    In one of my post about Service Bus Topics from Windows Azure I told you that I will write about a post that describe how we can design an a...
  • E-Learning Vendors Attempt to Morph Mobile
    The sign should read: " Don't touch! Wet Paint !" I had a good chuckle today after receiving my latest emailed copy of the eLe...
  • SQL - UNION and UNION ALL
    I think that all of us used until now UNION in a SQLstatement. Using this operator we can combine the result of 2 queries. For example we wa...
  • Cum sa salvezi un stream direct intr-un fisier
    Cred ca este a 2-a oara când întâlnesc aceasta cerința in decurs de câteva săptămâni. Se da un stream și o locație unde trebuie salvat, se c...
  • Task.Yield(...), Task.Delay(...)
    I think that a lot of person already heard about these new methods. In this post I want to clarify some things about these new methods that ...
  • Content Types - Level 4: Reference
    Level 4: Reference Materials & Static Content NOTE: This is part 5 of 7 in a continuing series; please see earlier posts for more backgr...

Categories

  • .NET
  • .NET nice to have
  • #if DEBUG
  • 15 iunie 2011
  • 15 octombrie 2011
  • 2011
  • abstracta
  • action
  • adaugare
  • ajax
  • Amsterdam
  • Android
  • aplicatii
  • App Fabric
  • Apple iSlate
  • array
  • as
  • ASP.NET
  • AsReadOnly
  • Assembly comun
  • async
  • Asynchronous programming
  • asyncron
  • Autofac
  • AutoMapper
  • az
  • Azure
  • Azure AppFabric Cache
  • Azure backup solution
  • Azure Storage Explorer
  • azure. cloud
  • backup
  • BCP utility
  • bing maps v7
  • BitArray
  • BlackBerry
  • blob
  • BlobContainerPublicAccessType
  • breakpoint
  • bucuresti
  • C#
  • cache
  • CallerMemberName
  • CellCast
  • Certificate
  • CES
  • change
  • ChannelFactory
  • clasa
  • classinitialize
  • clean code
  • click event
  • close
  • Cloud
  • Cluj
  • cluj-napoca
  • Code contracts
  • code retrat
  • codecamp
  • CollectionAssert
  • Compact Edition
  • compara
  • Comparer T .Default
  • CompareTo
  • comparison
  • comunitate
  • concurs
  • Conditional attribute
  • configurare
  • connection string
  • container
  • content type
  • control
  • Convert
  • convertAll
  • convertor
  • cross platform
  • CRUD
  • css
  • custom properties
  • custom request
  • DACPAC
  • Daniel Andres
  • data sync service
  • database
  • date time
  • datetime
  • debug
  • default
  • delegate
  • dependency injection
  • deploy
  • DeploymentItem
  • design patterns
  • Dev de Amsterdam
  • development stoage
  • dictionary
  • diferente
  • digging
  • director
  • Directory.Exist
  • disable
  • dispatcher
  • dispose
  • dropdown
  • dynamic
  • EF
  • email
  • encoding
  • entity framework
  • enum
  • enumerable
  • Environment.NewLine
  • error
  • error 404
  • error handling
  • eveniment
  • event
  • ews
  • excel
  • exception
  • exchange
  • exita
  • explicit
  • export
  • extension
  • field
  • File.Exist
  • finalize
  • fire and forget
  • Fluent interface pattern
  • format
  • func
  • GC.SuppressFinalize
  • generic
  • getdirectoryname
  • globalization
  • gmail
  • hackathon
  • Hadoop
  • handle
  • HTML
  • html 5
  • Html.ActionLink
  • http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
  • HttpModule
  • IComparable
  • IE
  • ienumerable
  • IIS
  • image
  • implicit
  • import
  • int
  • internationalization
  • Internet Explorer
  • interop
  • Ioc
  • IP Filter
  • iPhone
  • iQuest
  • IStructuralEquatable
  • ITCamp
  • itspark
  • java script
  • javascript
  • July 2012
  • KeyedByTypeCollection
  • KeyNotFoundException
  • Kinect SDK
  • lambda expression
  • LightSwitch Microsoft Silverlight
  • linq
  • list
  • lista
  • lista servicii
  • liste
  • Live Connect
  • Live ID
  • load
  • localization
  • lock
  • m-learning
  • MAC
  • Mango
  • map
  • mapare
  • mapare propietati
  • messagequeue
  • meta properties
  • method
  • MethodImpl
  • Metro App
  • Microsoft
  • Microsoft Sync Framework
  • mlearning
  • mlearning devices
  • Mobile Apps
  • mobile in the cloud
  • mobile learning
  • mobile services
  • Mobile Web
  • mongoDb
  • monitorizare
  • msmq
  • multitasking
  • MVC
  • MVC 3
  • MVVM
  • namespace
  • nextpartitionkey
  • nextrowkey
  • Ninject
  • nivel acces
  • no result
  • normalize
  • nosql
  • null expcetion
  • null object pattern
  • NullReferenceException
  • OAuth API
  • office
  • offline
  • Open ID
  • openhackeu2011
  • operations
  • operator
  • optimization
  • option
  • outputcache
  • OutputCacheProvider
  • override
  • paginare
  • pagination
  • path
  • persistare
  • Portable Library tool
  • Post event – CodeCamp Cluj-Napoca
  • predicate
  • predictions
  • prezentare
  • process
  • proiect
  • property
  • propietati
  • query
  • ReadOnlyCollection
  • ReadOnlyDictionary
  • referinta
  • reflection
  • remote
  • reply command
  • request
  • request response
  • resouce
  • REST
  • REST Client
  • RESTSharp
  • ronua
  • rss
  • rulare
  • salvare in fisier
  • sc
  • schimbare timp
  • select
  • select nodes
  • send
  • serializare
  • serialization
  • Server.Transfer. Resposen.Redirect
  • service bus
  • ServiceBase
  • servicecontroller
  • sesiune
  • session
  • Session_End
  • Session_Start
  • setup
  • Sibiu
  • signalR
  • Silverlight
  • sincronizare
  • Single Responsibility Principle
  • SkyDrive
  • skype
  • smartphones
  • smtp
  • Snapguide
  • sniffer
  • socket
  • solid
  • spec#
  • sql
  • Sql Azure
  • SQL CE
  • sql server 2008 RC
  • SRP
  • startuptype
  • stateful
  • stateless
  • static
  • stergere
  • store
  • store procedure
  • stream
  • string
  • string.join
  • struct
  • StructuralEqualityComparer
  • submit
  • switch
  • Symbian
  • Synchronized
  • system
  • tabele
  • table
  • techEd 2012
  • tempdata
  • test
  • testcleanup
  • testinitialize
  • testmethod
  • thread
  • timer
  • ToLower
  • tool
  • tostring
  • Total Cost Calculator
  • trace ASP.NET
  • transcoding
  • tuplu
  • tutorial
  • TWmLearning
  • type
  • unit test
  • unittest
  • UrlParameter.Optional
  • Validate
  • validation
  • verificare
  • video
  • view
  • ViewBag
  • virtual
  • visual studio
  • VM role
  • Vunvulea Radu
  • wallpaper
  • WCF
  • WebBrower
  • WebRequest
  • where clause
  • Windows
  • windows 8
  • Windows Azure
  • Windows Azure Service Management CmdLets
  • windows live messenger
  • Windows Mobile
  • Windows Phone
  • windows service
  • windows store application
  • Windows Task
  • WinRT
  • word
  • workaround
  • XBox
  • xml
  • xmlns
  • XNA
  • xpath
  • YMesseger
  • Yonder
  • Zip

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (139)
    • ►  November (17)
    • ►  October (12)
    • ►  September (10)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (8)
    • ►  June (15)
    • ►  May (12)
    • ►  April (17)
    • ►  March (16)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ▼  2012 (251)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (19)
    • ►  October (26)
    • ►  September (13)
    • ►  August (35)
    • ▼  July (28)
      • Metro App - Binding error on field "id"
      • Trace information to Windows Azure Azure Tables
      • Windows Azure Websites - Shared and Reserved mode
      • How to use local configuration in a Metro App
      • Shared Access Signature and URL encoding on Window...
      • Accessing hardware configuration from a Metro App
      • Post event – CodeCamp Cluj-Napoca, July 2012
      • SQL - UNION and UNION ALL
      • Some scenarios when we can use Shared Access Signa...
      • Shared Access Signature on Windows Azure - Overview
      • A strange way to make an update to items from data...
      • How to remove or edit a Shared Access Signature fr...
      • How to use Shared Access Signature with tables fro...
      • Weak software design - Restrict user access in the...
      • How to use Shared Access Signature with queues fro...
      • Task.Yield(...), Task.Delay(...)
      • How to use Shared Access Signature with blobs from...
      • What is the behavior of an async method that retur...
      • Code refactoring - Create base class/interface whe...
      • Definition of Private Cloud
      • Codecamp de iulie in Cluj-Napoca
      • What cache mechanism to use from Windows Azure
      • Windows Azure Cache - What are regions and tags an...
      • How does the Windows Azure in-memory cache works
      • Some deployment methods of a web application on Wi...
      • What are the limitation of Windows Azure Tables
      • How to disable the cache content of a web site tha...
      • From now on all blog content will be in English
    • ►  June (27)
    • ►  May (24)
    • ►  April (18)
    • ►  March (17)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (15)
  • ►  2011 (127)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (14)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2010 (26)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (14)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile