Windows Mobile Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 15 April 2013

(Part 4) Testing the limits of Windows Azure Service Bus

Posted on 03:04 by Unknown

In the last post related to this subject we discover how we can process millions of messages over a network using Windows Azure Service Bus Topic. For the problem that we want to resolve we find out that 4 worker roles of Medium size is the perfect configuration for our case.
In this post we will talk about costs. We will see what the costs to process 10.000.000 messages are. We assume that messages are send to Service Bus from our on-premise servers. If the messages are send from our the same data center, the cost related to bandwidth would be 0.
Sending messages to Service Bus

  • Sending messages: 10$
  • Bandwidth cost: 27.46$ 

Receive messages from Service Bus

  • Receiving messages: 10$
  • Bandwidth cost: 0$ (we are in the same data center)

Worker role costs:

  • 4 medium worker roles: 8.64$

Remarks: From our results, we need 8h and 40 minutes to process 10.000.000 messages from Service Bus. In this time we included the warm up of each instance – 20 minutes. We calculate the cost of running 4 instances for 9 hours.
Windows Azure Table Storage:

  • Storage: 5$ (cost per month)
  •         Transactions:  2$

Remarks: In the transaction cost is included the cost of reading other data from Table Storage. Otherwise the cost of transaction to Table Storage would be maximum 1$ - because of batch support this value can be smaller.
The final cost of processing 10.000.000 messages and store them to Table Storage for 1 month is:

  • 63.1$ (when messages are send from on-premise servers)
  • 35.64$ (when messages are send from the same data center)

In theory, using this configuration, the price of each message processing would be 0.0003564$. What do you think about this cost? I would say that this is a pretty good price.
If we would need to process 10.000.000 every day, during a month, our final cost would be:

  • 924.2$ (when messages are send from the same data center)

In this post we saw what the costs of processing 10.000.000 messages are. Even if the costs look pretty good, I still have one thing that I don’t like - the time processing of all messages is pretty high – over than 1 hour and a half. In the next post we will see what we can do decrease the time processing.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Azure, service bus, Windows Azure | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Service Bus Topic - Automatic forward messages from a subscription to a topic
    Windows Azure Service Bus Topic is a service that enables us to distribute the same messages to different consumers without having to know e...
  • Patterns in Windows Azure Service Bus - Message Splitter Pattern
    In one of my post about Service Bus Topics from Windows Azure I told you that I will write about a post that describe how we can design an a...
  • CDN is not the only solution to improve the page speed - Reverse Caching Proxy
    I heard more and more often think like this: “If your website is to slow, you should use a CDN.” Great, CDN is THE solution for any kind of ...
  • E-Learning Vendors Attempt to Morph Mobile
    The sign should read: " Don't touch! Wet Paint !" I had a good chuckle today after receiving my latest emailed copy of the eLe...
  • Content Types - Level 6: Rich Media
    Level 6: Rich Media NOTE: This is part 7 of 7 and the conclusion of this continuing series; please see earlier posts for more background inf...
  • Publishing our CellCast Widget for iPad
    The rush has been on this week as our development team worked to design a new version of our CellCast Widget specifically for Apple's up...
  • Content Types - Level 5: Courseware
    Level 5: Content and Courseware NOTE: This is part 6 of 7 in a continuing series; please see earlier posts for more background information. ...
  • SQL - UNION and UNION ALL
    I think that all of us used until now UNION in a SQLstatement. Using this operator we can combine the result of 2 queries. For example we wa...
  • Cum sa salvezi un stream direct intr-un fisier
    Cred ca este a 2-a oara când întâlnesc aceasta cerința in decurs de câteva săptămâni. Se da un stream și o locație unde trebuie salvat, se c...
  • Content Types - Level 4: Reference
    Level 4: Reference Materials & Static Content NOTE: This is part 5 of 7 in a continuing series; please see earlier posts for more backgr...

Categories

  • .NET
  • .NET nice to have
  • #if DEBUG
  • 15 iunie 2011
  • 15 octombrie 2011
  • 2011
  • abstracta
  • action
  • adaugare
  • ajax
  • Amsterdam
  • Android
  • aplicatii
  • App Fabric
  • Apple iSlate
  • array
  • as
  • ASP.NET
  • AsReadOnly
  • Assembly comun
  • async
  • Asynchronous programming
  • asyncron
  • Autofac
  • AutoMapper
  • az
  • Azure
  • Azure AppFabric Cache
  • Azure backup solution
  • Azure Storage Explorer
  • azure. cloud
  • backup
  • BCP utility
  • bing maps v7
  • BitArray
  • BlackBerry
  • blob
  • BlobContainerPublicAccessType
  • breakpoint
  • bucuresti
  • C#
  • cache
  • CallerMemberName
  • CellCast
  • Certificate
  • CES
  • change
  • ChannelFactory
  • clasa
  • classinitialize
  • clean code
  • click event
  • close
  • Cloud
  • Cluj
  • cluj-napoca
  • Code contracts
  • code retrat
  • codecamp
  • CollectionAssert
  • Compact Edition
  • compara
  • Comparer T .Default
  • CompareTo
  • comparison
  • comunitate
  • concurs
  • Conditional attribute
  • configurare
  • connection string
  • container
  • content type
  • control
  • Convert
  • convertAll
  • convertor
  • cross platform
  • CRUD
  • css
  • custom properties
  • custom request
  • DACPAC
  • Daniel Andres
  • data sync service
  • database
  • date time
  • datetime
  • debug
  • default
  • delegate
  • dependency injection
  • deploy
  • DeploymentItem
  • design patterns
  • Dev de Amsterdam
  • development stoage
  • dictionary
  • diferente
  • digging
  • director
  • Directory.Exist
  • disable
  • dispatcher
  • dispose
  • dropdown
  • dynamic
  • EF
  • email
  • encoding
  • entity framework
  • enum
  • enumerable
  • Environment.NewLine
  • error
  • error 404
  • error handling
  • eveniment
  • event
  • ews
  • excel
  • exception
  • exchange
  • exita
  • explicit
  • export
  • extension
  • field
  • File.Exist
  • finalize
  • fire and forget
  • Fluent interface pattern
  • format
  • func
  • GC.SuppressFinalize
  • generic
  • getdirectoryname
  • globalization
  • gmail
  • hackathon
  • Hadoop
  • handle
  • HTML
  • html 5
  • Html.ActionLink
  • http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
  • HttpModule
  • IComparable
  • IE
  • ienumerable
  • IIS
  • image
  • implicit
  • import
  • int
  • internationalization
  • Internet Explorer
  • interop
  • Ioc
  • IP Filter
  • iPhone
  • iQuest
  • IStructuralEquatable
  • ITCamp
  • itspark
  • java script
  • javascript
  • July 2012
  • KeyedByTypeCollection
  • KeyNotFoundException
  • Kinect SDK
  • lambda expression
  • LightSwitch Microsoft Silverlight
  • linq
  • list
  • lista
  • lista servicii
  • liste
  • Live Connect
  • Live ID
  • load
  • localization
  • lock
  • m-learning
  • MAC
  • Mango
  • map
  • mapare
  • mapare propietati
  • messagequeue
  • meta properties
  • method
  • MethodImpl
  • Metro App
  • Microsoft
  • Microsoft Sync Framework
  • mlearning
  • mlearning devices
  • Mobile Apps
  • mobile in the cloud
  • mobile learning
  • mobile services
  • Mobile Web
  • mongoDb
  • monitorizare
  • msmq
  • multitasking
  • MVC
  • MVC 3
  • MVVM
  • namespace
  • nextpartitionkey
  • nextrowkey
  • Ninject
  • nivel acces
  • no result
  • normalize
  • nosql
  • null expcetion
  • null object pattern
  • NullReferenceException
  • OAuth API
  • office
  • offline
  • Open ID
  • openhackeu2011
  • operations
  • operator
  • optimization
  • option
  • outputcache
  • OutputCacheProvider
  • override
  • paginare
  • pagination
  • path
  • persistare
  • Portable Library tool
  • Post event – CodeCamp Cluj-Napoca
  • predicate
  • predictions
  • prezentare
  • process
  • proiect
  • property
  • propietati
  • query
  • ReadOnlyCollection
  • ReadOnlyDictionary
  • referinta
  • reflection
  • remote
  • reply command
  • request
  • request response
  • resouce
  • REST
  • REST Client
  • RESTSharp
  • ronua
  • rss
  • rulare
  • salvare in fisier
  • sc
  • schimbare timp
  • select
  • select nodes
  • send
  • serializare
  • serialization
  • Server.Transfer. Resposen.Redirect
  • service bus
  • ServiceBase
  • servicecontroller
  • sesiune
  • session
  • Session_End
  • Session_Start
  • setup
  • Sibiu
  • signalR
  • Silverlight
  • sincronizare
  • Single Responsibility Principle
  • SkyDrive
  • skype
  • smartphones
  • smtp
  • Snapguide
  • sniffer
  • socket
  • solid
  • spec#
  • sql
  • Sql Azure
  • SQL CE
  • sql server 2008 RC
  • SRP
  • startuptype
  • stateful
  • stateless
  • static
  • stergere
  • store
  • store procedure
  • stream
  • string
  • string.join
  • struct
  • StructuralEqualityComparer
  • submit
  • switch
  • Symbian
  • Synchronized
  • system
  • tabele
  • table
  • techEd 2012
  • tempdata
  • test
  • testcleanup
  • testinitialize
  • testmethod
  • thread
  • timer
  • ToLower
  • tool
  • tostring
  • Total Cost Calculator
  • trace ASP.NET
  • transcoding
  • tuplu
  • tutorial
  • TWmLearning
  • type
  • unit test
  • unittest
  • UrlParameter.Optional
  • Validate
  • validation
  • verificare
  • video
  • view
  • ViewBag
  • virtual
  • visual studio
  • VM role
  • Vunvulea Radu
  • wallpaper
  • WCF
  • WebBrower
  • WebRequest
  • where clause
  • Windows
  • windows 8
  • Windows Azure
  • Windows Azure Service Management CmdLets
  • windows live messenger
  • Windows Mobile
  • Windows Phone
  • windows service
  • windows store application
  • Windows Task
  • WinRT
  • word
  • workaround
  • XBox
  • xml
  • xmlns
  • XNA
  • xpath
  • YMesseger
  • Yonder
  • Zip

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (139)
    • ►  November (17)
    • ►  October (12)
    • ►  September (10)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (8)
    • ►  June (15)
    • ►  May (12)
    • ▼  April (17)
      • Event-Driven message consumtion (aka pump model) ...
      • [Post-Event] Windows Azure Boot Camp in Cluj-Napoca
      • [Post-Event] AISEC Cluj-Napoca, NoSQL
      • Coding Stories III - JavaScript and Syntactic sugar
      • Coding Stories || - John and Gigel
      • WCF and "Error in deserializing body of reply mes...
      • Configuration files horror
      • Steam.CopyTo - Performance problems
      • Asynchronous Master Class, May 18-19, Cluj-Napoca
      • (Part 4) Testing the limits of Windows Azure Servi...
      • [Post-Event] AISEC Cluj-Napoca, Cloud and Windows ...
      • How to NOT do Web Services versioning (WCF)
      • ITCamp 2013, May 23-24
      • How to write unit-tests for async methods
      • Windows Azure Bootcamp at Cluj-Napoca, 27 April 2013
      • Coding Stories
      • (Part 3) Testing the limits of Windows Azure Servi...
    • ►  March (16)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ►  2012 (251)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (19)
    • ►  October (26)
    • ►  September (13)
    • ►  August (35)
    • ►  July (28)
    • ►  June (27)
    • ►  May (24)
    • ►  April (18)
    • ►  March (17)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (15)
  • ►  2011 (127)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (14)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2010 (26)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (14)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile