Windows Mobile Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, 3 May 2013

(Part 5) Testing the limits of Windows Azure Service Bus

Posted on 07:07 by Unknown

In the last series of post about testing the limits of Windows Azure Service Bus we saw what is the best configuration for our problem, the best configuration is to have 4 medium instances.
The next question for us is: How we can decrease the time processing?
In our case we saw that from the cost and benefits perspective we reached the limitation on Service Bus. This is around 4 medium instances that are able to process around  1.000.000 messages in 34 minutes. But what we can do if we have 10.000.000 messages that needs to be processed in 1 hour.
We could increase the number of instances, but this will not improve our performance too much. In this moment we use only one topic. This topic, as Service Bus, has its own limitations – we cannot make an undefined number of request per second and expect to have a low latency.
A solution to decrease the number of request is to use batches – we already use them.
Another solution is to scale the topics. In this moment we have only one topic. If we would use 5 topics, than we could have 4 instances that will consume messages for each topic. In this way we could consume 5.000.000 messages in 34 minutes. The downside is from the cost perspective. The costs will increase with a 5X factor.
From the cost perceptive, this would be acceptable because all the instances work at maximum capacity. In the moment when we don’t need any more this instances we could stop them.
The only problem is how we can distribute the messages between different topics.
One solution would be to identify different attributes of our messages and try to group messages based on this attributes. In this way we could distributed the messages on more than one topic. In theory this could be a good solution, but how many times you could group items in an equal way. In real life this cannot be accomplish in normal cases.
What we could do is to create a mechanism that can select what topic to use. For example each producer, at a specific time interval or after he send a specific number of messages, check what is the load on each topic and decide what topic should be used.
In this way we could have a flat distribution of messages over our topics.
In this post we saw how we can scale on horizontal Windows Azure Service Bus. With a good design we should be able to support scaling in all the locations where we expect to have a bottleneck.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Azure, service bus, Windows Azure | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Service Bus Topic - Automatic forward messages from a subscription to a topic
    Windows Azure Service Bus Topic is a service that enables us to distribute the same messages to different consumers without having to know e...
  • Patterns in Windows Azure Service Bus - Message Splitter Pattern
    In one of my post about Service Bus Topics from Windows Azure I told you that I will write about a post that describe how we can design an a...
  • CDN is not the only solution to improve the page speed - Reverse Caching Proxy
    I heard more and more often think like this: “If your website is to slow, you should use a CDN.” Great, CDN is THE solution for any kind of ...
  • E-Learning Vendors Attempt to Morph Mobile
    The sign should read: " Don't touch! Wet Paint !" I had a good chuckle today after receiving my latest emailed copy of the eLe...
  • Content Types - Level 6: Rich Media
    Level 6: Rich Media NOTE: This is part 7 of 7 and the conclusion of this continuing series; please see earlier posts for more background inf...
  • Publishing our CellCast Widget for iPad
    The rush has been on this week as our development team worked to design a new version of our CellCast Widget specifically for Apple's up...
  • Content Types - Level 5: Courseware
    Level 5: Content and Courseware NOTE: This is part 6 of 7 in a continuing series; please see earlier posts for more background information. ...
  • SQL - UNION and UNION ALL
    I think that all of us used until now UNION in a SQLstatement. Using this operator we can combine the result of 2 queries. For example we wa...
  • Cum sa salvezi un stream direct intr-un fisier
    Cred ca este a 2-a oara când întâlnesc aceasta cerința in decurs de câteva săptămâni. Se da un stream și o locație unde trebuie salvat, se c...
  • Content Types - Level 4: Reference
    Level 4: Reference Materials & Static Content NOTE: This is part 5 of 7 in a continuing series; please see earlier posts for more backgr...

Categories

  • .NET
  • .NET nice to have
  • #if DEBUG
  • 15 iunie 2011
  • 15 octombrie 2011
  • 2011
  • abstracta
  • action
  • adaugare
  • ajax
  • Amsterdam
  • Android
  • aplicatii
  • App Fabric
  • Apple iSlate
  • array
  • as
  • ASP.NET
  • AsReadOnly
  • Assembly comun
  • async
  • Asynchronous programming
  • asyncron
  • Autofac
  • AutoMapper
  • az
  • Azure
  • Azure AppFabric Cache
  • Azure backup solution
  • Azure Storage Explorer
  • azure. cloud
  • backup
  • BCP utility
  • bing maps v7
  • BitArray
  • BlackBerry
  • blob
  • BlobContainerPublicAccessType
  • breakpoint
  • bucuresti
  • C#
  • cache
  • CallerMemberName
  • CellCast
  • Certificate
  • CES
  • change
  • ChannelFactory
  • clasa
  • classinitialize
  • clean code
  • click event
  • close
  • Cloud
  • Cluj
  • cluj-napoca
  • Code contracts
  • code retrat
  • codecamp
  • CollectionAssert
  • Compact Edition
  • compara
  • Comparer T .Default
  • CompareTo
  • comparison
  • comunitate
  • concurs
  • Conditional attribute
  • configurare
  • connection string
  • container
  • content type
  • control
  • Convert
  • convertAll
  • convertor
  • cross platform
  • CRUD
  • css
  • custom properties
  • custom request
  • DACPAC
  • Daniel Andres
  • data sync service
  • database
  • date time
  • datetime
  • debug
  • default
  • delegate
  • dependency injection
  • deploy
  • DeploymentItem
  • design patterns
  • Dev de Amsterdam
  • development stoage
  • dictionary
  • diferente
  • digging
  • director
  • Directory.Exist
  • disable
  • dispatcher
  • dispose
  • dropdown
  • dynamic
  • EF
  • email
  • encoding
  • entity framework
  • enum
  • enumerable
  • Environment.NewLine
  • error
  • error 404
  • error handling
  • eveniment
  • event
  • ews
  • excel
  • exception
  • exchange
  • exita
  • explicit
  • export
  • extension
  • field
  • File.Exist
  • finalize
  • fire and forget
  • Fluent interface pattern
  • format
  • func
  • GC.SuppressFinalize
  • generic
  • getdirectoryname
  • globalization
  • gmail
  • hackathon
  • Hadoop
  • handle
  • HTML
  • html 5
  • Html.ActionLink
  • http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
  • HttpModule
  • IComparable
  • IE
  • ienumerable
  • IIS
  • image
  • implicit
  • import
  • int
  • internationalization
  • Internet Explorer
  • interop
  • Ioc
  • IP Filter
  • iPhone
  • iQuest
  • IStructuralEquatable
  • ITCamp
  • itspark
  • java script
  • javascript
  • July 2012
  • KeyedByTypeCollection
  • KeyNotFoundException
  • Kinect SDK
  • lambda expression
  • LightSwitch Microsoft Silverlight
  • linq
  • list
  • lista
  • lista servicii
  • liste
  • Live Connect
  • Live ID
  • load
  • localization
  • lock
  • m-learning
  • MAC
  • Mango
  • map
  • mapare
  • mapare propietati
  • messagequeue
  • meta properties
  • method
  • MethodImpl
  • Metro App
  • Microsoft
  • Microsoft Sync Framework
  • mlearning
  • mlearning devices
  • Mobile Apps
  • mobile in the cloud
  • mobile learning
  • mobile services
  • Mobile Web
  • mongoDb
  • monitorizare
  • msmq
  • multitasking
  • MVC
  • MVC 3
  • MVVM
  • namespace
  • nextpartitionkey
  • nextrowkey
  • Ninject
  • nivel acces
  • no result
  • normalize
  • nosql
  • null expcetion
  • null object pattern
  • NullReferenceException
  • OAuth API
  • office
  • offline
  • Open ID
  • openhackeu2011
  • operations
  • operator
  • optimization
  • option
  • outputcache
  • OutputCacheProvider
  • override
  • paginare
  • pagination
  • path
  • persistare
  • Portable Library tool
  • Post event – CodeCamp Cluj-Napoca
  • predicate
  • predictions
  • prezentare
  • process
  • proiect
  • property
  • propietati
  • query
  • ReadOnlyCollection
  • ReadOnlyDictionary
  • referinta
  • reflection
  • remote
  • reply command
  • request
  • request response
  • resouce
  • REST
  • REST Client
  • RESTSharp
  • ronua
  • rss
  • rulare
  • salvare in fisier
  • sc
  • schimbare timp
  • select
  • select nodes
  • send
  • serializare
  • serialization
  • Server.Transfer. Resposen.Redirect
  • service bus
  • ServiceBase
  • servicecontroller
  • sesiune
  • session
  • Session_End
  • Session_Start
  • setup
  • Sibiu
  • signalR
  • Silverlight
  • sincronizare
  • Single Responsibility Principle
  • SkyDrive
  • skype
  • smartphones
  • smtp
  • Snapguide
  • sniffer
  • socket
  • solid
  • spec#
  • sql
  • Sql Azure
  • SQL CE
  • sql server 2008 RC
  • SRP
  • startuptype
  • stateful
  • stateless
  • static
  • stergere
  • store
  • store procedure
  • stream
  • string
  • string.join
  • struct
  • StructuralEqualityComparer
  • submit
  • switch
  • Symbian
  • Synchronized
  • system
  • tabele
  • table
  • techEd 2012
  • tempdata
  • test
  • testcleanup
  • testinitialize
  • testmethod
  • thread
  • timer
  • ToLower
  • tool
  • tostring
  • Total Cost Calculator
  • trace ASP.NET
  • transcoding
  • tuplu
  • tutorial
  • TWmLearning
  • type
  • unit test
  • unittest
  • UrlParameter.Optional
  • Validate
  • validation
  • verificare
  • video
  • view
  • ViewBag
  • virtual
  • visual studio
  • VM role
  • Vunvulea Radu
  • wallpaper
  • WCF
  • WebBrower
  • WebRequest
  • where clause
  • Windows
  • windows 8
  • Windows Azure
  • Windows Azure Service Management CmdLets
  • windows live messenger
  • Windows Mobile
  • Windows Phone
  • windows service
  • windows store application
  • Windows Task
  • WinRT
  • word
  • workaround
  • XBox
  • xml
  • xmlns
  • XNA
  • xpath
  • YMesseger
  • Yonder
  • Zip

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (139)
    • ►  November (17)
    • ►  October (12)
    • ►  September (10)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (8)
    • ►  June (15)
    • ▼  May (12)
      • Windows Azure - CRON jobs on Web Roles
      • [Post-event] ITCamp 2013
      • JavaScript, Unit Test, Visual Studio and Build Mac...
      • [Post-Event] Asynchronous Master Class, May 18-19,...
      • Testing the limits of Windows Azure Service Bus
      • Hadoop and HDFS
      • NoSQL in 5 minutes
      • How to iterage a Service Bus Queue using Azure SDK...
      • HDFS and Hadoop - Today Software Magazine
      • Taks and Thread.Sleep
      • (Part 5) Testing the limits of Windows Azure Servi...
      • Windows Azure Service Bus - Control what actions c...
    • ►  April (17)
    • ►  March (16)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ►  2012 (251)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (19)
    • ►  October (26)
    • ►  September (13)
    • ►  August (35)
    • ►  July (28)
    • ►  June (27)
    • ►  May (24)
    • ►  April (18)
    • ►  March (17)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (15)
  • ►  2011 (127)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (14)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2010 (26)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (14)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile